14 Comments
User's avatar
Lois's avatar

You, General Flynn, would be a perfect person to nominate and vet these individuals.

Expand full comment
JD Decuypere's avatar

Well good morning General Sir. That's a bit of cheerful news to start the day, lol. Is there any chance sir that you might assist in compiling a short list of preferred candidates sir? The administration simply in not keeping pace with the tasks at hand. The president is at a deficit of street fighters on his team.

Expand full comment
Don Sovie's avatar

there are so many great comments already from JD Lois, and Manuel. I would just add that the administration should start by removing all of the Biden holdovers. It would be better in my humble opinion to have an open position staffed by at lower level Attaches that don't require senate approval. in my experience, as a staff officer at the Pentagon in the 70s and several decades of international trade related business experience I can almost guarantee that the Biden holdovers are still implementing Obama policies; so there is urgency to getting rid of them and implementing the other recommendations of America's General.

Expand full comment
JD Decuypere's avatar

Great advice DS, expedite the Obama/Biden appointments immediately. As a matter of fact, removal of all personnel appointed by Obama in his first, second or third term, is paramount. If there's one disappointing aspect to president Trump's second term. To date he's failed to go scorched earth on swamp scum leftovers. I really want everything exposed, Epstein's list, SSI frauds, NGO's who are receiving taxpayer money like the 34 million that's financing the LA riots. Or the Catholic relief services org supporting illegal aliens. It's madness to operate with a Markus of queensbury, congenial approach. It's time to frag the cesspool and pick up the pieces later. We have nothing to lose!

Expand full comment
JD Decuypere's avatar

Marques of Queensberry, I butchered the correct spelling.

Expand full comment
Manuel Núñez's avatar

Senate Republicans need to stop the nonsense, “words without actions”are nothing more than very loud noises, are you working for American or against it?

The mandate given to you back in November was loud a clear; you need to FOCUS AND EXECUTE

gentlemen, WE THE PEOPLE DEMAND IT.

Expand full comment
Don Sovie's avatar

Thank you America's General step-by-step we need to move forward. This is a war and the Progressive never stop fighting it; and many of our Republicans in Congress are not doing an effective job overcoming that opposition. Your voice is essential. Your thoughts are prescient, your perspective irreplaceable . Thank you for being America's General.

Expand full comment
Maureen Mehlman's avatar

Wow. That's a powerful essay on the matter. I think YOU would make a great candidate. It's necessary to stop the anemic State Department from dropping this ball any longer. The global diplomacy stage is a perilous, not-a- game, strategic landscape. It has pitfalls and is where many battles are thwarted from becoming deadly confrontation. Nothing is more important.

Expand full comment
Miriamnae's avatar

Thank you for valuable info and tips to send to Reps and Senators.

Expand full comment
jtrudel trudelgroup.com's avatar

WE DO NEED CANDIDATES WHO SUPPORT AMERICA. PATRIOTS. BUT WE ALSO NEED HONEST COURTS, AND ON AN URGENT BASIS.

There is an unmistakably surreal element to the current judicial insurrection: Who are these people? The executive and legislative branches of government are very public, their representatives profiled and interviewed daily online, on television and in print. In stark contrast, the judicial branch of government – both its members and its workings – remain largely invisible.

The mask is ripped off in the powerful June issue of WND's acclaimed Whistleblower magazine, titled https://superstore.wnd.com/whistleblower/

https://jtrudel.substack.com/p/dont-let-woke-judges-destroy-our?r=6r9ya

Expand full comment
JD Decuypere's avatar

Was it Jefferson that first expressed concern over Marberry? If the judiciary can over rule the presidents executive branch decisions. What's the purpose for 3 separate branches. The judicial branch is to interpret the constitution isn't it? Congress makes laws,correct? The political gamesmanship should have no place in the system. But again, that falls back in the lap of the ignorant uninformed voters.

Expand full comment
JD Decuypere's avatar

General Flynn sir, what about former military personnel as interim staffing? At least we can have confidence in their loyalty to the constitution. And perhaps you might consider heading up an oversight board. To field questions that might benefit from your vast intelligence experience. A support network if you will to render guidance as needed for the interim appointees. I've always been of the belief. That leadership is defined by finding the appropriate solution to the challenges encountered. And there's no one better equipped than you are sir.

Expand full comment